Explained: The Biggest Cheating Scandal in Chess History (Part 1)

This video explains part 1 of the the biggest cheating scandal in chess history. This Magnus Carlsen/Hans Niemann, chess cheating scandal has rocked the chess world and wild theories, from sex toys (anal beads), to leaked prep have emerged. There are big names involved, such as Hikaru Nakamura and Danny Rensch of Chess.com and people want things explained. What really happened in the Sinquefield Cup Round 3, in St. Louis, and what next for chess following the biggest chess cheating scandal of all time!?

Part 2 here:

Hans Niemann’s Round 5 (Sinquefield Cup) interview:

💲If you would like to support the channel with a donation then please use: paypal.me/EpicChess

or consider joining the channel to gain access to some awesome perks:

As always thank you for your support!

#chesscheating #chess #chessscandal #hansniemann #magnuscarlsen #epicchess

22 Comments

  1. first of all, why would a large event invite someone who cheated before?

  2. Bobby Fischer definitely will hate Hans, and probably like Magnus. Maybe Ding too

  3. Getting perfect accuracy against Magnus as black pieces made Nieman's whole day but actually beating him at the age of 19 made his hole weak.

  4. I PLAYED THIS VIDEO IN 1.25 SPEED SO I CAN LISTEN TO THIS GUY SPEKING NORMAL AND NOT THINK THAT HES IS IN SLOW MOTION

  5. If it's anal beans. We have to give him the win. 😂

  6. Carlson is hand down the best ever. He got nothing to prove anymore. So when he points finger, it needs to be taken seriously.

  7. BAGAGAGAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAGGAGAAHHA ANAL BEADS😂😂😂

  8. I don't think he cheated, otherwise he would have been directly accused of cheating. I think magnus has gotten into slump. He is frustated. But, He will return soon in form. It happens to all players.

    Just my personal thoughts.

  9. Imagine while playing your anal beads, start glitching 😂

  10. Well he only cheated twice, when he was looking to “rapidly enhance his rating”.. you know, because 2 matches is all it takes.. and it was only because he was looking to “play stronger players”..he only had to cheat because the players were too weak..👌scumbag

  11. You can see by the way he is walking and by the rush he's in, his butt hurts from so much vibrating.

  12. 9 minutes and 13 seconds of continuous click bait.

  13. Some Brilliant Moves Computers Can't seen
    ..it maybe a Good Move, But In Chess, Destiny will decide if You Win or Lose, Magnus Lose with a Blunder too

  14. I would imagine that when Magnuss plugged the game into his own top chess engine, he found out the Hans Niemann was playing at like 99% accuracy… FYI Hikaru Nakamura Only plays at 90-92% on average, and he is a 2800 rated player on Magnus's level.
    Hans however, was under 2700, and that game was played at least on a 2900 to 3000 ELO level.
    That is what got Mangus's attention and why he withdrew. He sees someone playing on a higher level than He did during his 125 game streak in 2018-2020, and he was like "WHAT?"

  15. Magnus just got mad cus he lost, sore loser😂😂😂

  16. Magnus made clear errors (errors for a seasoned GM anyway) on move 39 –instead of B-d6 he should try Rd7xb7, and then the fatal move 42 where he played R-d7 when he needed R-f4 to stay in the game, with playing 42) R-d7 Magnus ultimately loses both king-side pawns and the game as he cannot stop the two black king-side pawn advance… reminiscent of Capablanca's and Karpov's crushing endgames

  17. Magnus made clear errors (errors for a seasoned GM anyway) on move 39 –instead of B-d6 he should try Rd7xb7, and then the fatal move 42 where he played R-d7 when he needed R-f4 to stay in the game, with playing 42) R-d7 Magnus ultimately loses both king-side pawns and the game as he cannot stop the two black king-side pawn advance… reminiscent of Capablanca's and Karpov's crushing endgames

  18. So…. there isn't even a reason to suspect Hans cheated – other then to conclude he should not be able to beat the champ..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *